CAT/C/64/D/641/2014 as required under article 3 of the Convention. Moreover, his claims do not establish that the evaluation of his asylum application by the Swedish authorities failed to comply with the standards of review required by the Convention. 9. Accordingly, the Committee, acting under article 22 (7) of the Convention, is of the view that the return of the complainant to Côte d’Ivoire would not constitute a violation of article 3 of the Convention. 11