01005681 Case File No. 002/19-09-2007/ECCC/TC E313 willing to respond, the Chamber put all questions it considered pertinent, whether or not they would tend to prove or disprove the guilt of the Accused. The parties were also provided an opportunity for questioning the Accused.69 The Accuseds’ statements constitute evidence before the Chamber.70 28. KHIEU Samphan made an opening statement and gave evidence on 13 December 2011 and 12 January 2012, but thereafter declined to answer questions, indicating that he first wanted to hear the evidence against him.71 In May 2013, KHIEU Samphan responded to questions posed by some Civil Parties.72 On 9 July 2013, KHIEU Samphan again invoked his right to remain silent.73 On 31 October 2013, KHIEU Samphan made a final statement.74 29. Between December 2011 and April 2012, NUON Chea made various statements and responded to questions from the Chamber and parties.75 On 18 April 2012, NUON Chea invoked his right to remain silent.76 NUON Chea made additional statements and responded to questioning on various occasions between June 2012 and July 2013.77 NUON Chea again invoked his right to remain silent on 17 July 2013.78 NUON Chea made a final statement on 31 October 2013.79 69 Internal Rule 90(1); Trial Chamber Response to Co-Prosecutors’ Requests concerning Testimony of the Accused (E101 and E101/1) (TC), E101/5, 27 October 2011, p. 1; Response to Issues Raised by Parties in Advance of Trial and Scheduling of Informal Meeting with Senior Legal Officer on 18 November 2011 (TC), E141, 17 November 2011, p. 3. 70 T. 18 April 2012, p. 40; See also, Internal Rule 87(5). 71 T. 13 December 2011, pp. 62-96; T. 12 January 2012, pp. 51-83; See also, T. 16 January 2012, pp. 77-79. 72 T. 29 May 2013, pp. 18-24, 28, 54-55, 85-88; T. 30 May 2013, pp. 16-18, 80-83; T. 4 June 2013, pp. 24-25, 68-70, 109-110. 73 T. 9 July 2013, pp. 41-43. 74 T. 31 October 2013, pp. 68-73. 75 T. 5 December 2011; T. 6 December 2011, pp. 4-31; T. 13 December 2011, pp. 2-55; T. 14 December 2011, pp. 2-55; T. 15 December 2011, pp. 29-102; T. 10 January 2012, pp. 10-72; T. 11 January 2012, pp. 9-53; T. 12 January 2012, pp. 8-51; T. 30 January 2012, pp. 1-31; T. 31 January 2012, pp. 1-55; T. 8 February 2012, pp. 8-53; T. 9 February 2012, pp. 39-50; T. 16 February 2012, pp. 4-10; T. 20 March 2012, pp. 52-53; T. 19 March 2012, p. 23; T. 18 April 2012, pp. 3-4. 76 T. 18 April 2012, pp. 4-7. 77 T. 20 June 2012, pp. 71-73; T. 10 October 2012, pp. 6-7; T. 6 June 2013, pp. 37-41; T. 9 July 2013, pp. 16-27; T. 29 May 2013, pp. 26-27, 28, 55-56; T. 30 May 2013, pp. 18-20, 83-85; T. 4 June 2013, p. 26, 70-71. 78 T. 17 July 2013, pp. 16-17. 79 T. 31 October 2013, pp. 1-34. Case 002/01, Judgement, 7 August 2014 - Public 14