01005683 Case File No. 002/19-09-2007/ECCC/TC E313 the Chamber admitted his prior statement, noting that it would not base any conviction decisively thereupon and thereby safeguarding the rights of the Accused.85 32. Over the course of Case 002/01, 92 individuals appeared before the Chamber concerning the substantive matters at issue including 58 witnesses (of whom, five were character witnesses called on behalf of KHIEU Samphan), three experts and 31 Civil Parties. Five appeared by video-link.86 The Chamber admitted 1,124 written statements and transcripts of witnesses and Civil Parties who did not appear before the Chamber in place of oral testimony.87 2.3.4.2.3. 33. Documentary Evidence Following the opportunity for public, adversarial debate, the Chamber admitted 5,824 pieces of documentary evidence, including contemporaneous and analytical documents, audio and video recordings and the written evidence of witnesses, experts and Civil Parties.88 85 Decision on Co-Prosecutors’ Rule 92 Submission Regarding the Admission of Witness Statements and Other Documents before the Trial Chamber, E96/7, 20 June 2012, paras 21-22, 32-33; Decision on Objections to the Admissibility of Witness, Victim and Civil Party Statements and Case 001 Transcripts Proposed by the Co-Prosecutors and Civil Party Lead Co-Lawyers, E299, 15 August 2013, paras 29-30. 86 LONG Norin, Denise AFFONÇO, Sydney SCHANBERG, Phillipe JULLIAN-GAUFRES and CHAU Sockon. Internal Rule 26(1) permits testimony by real-time audio or video link where it is not “seriously prejudicial to, or inconsistent with, defence rights”. 87 Decision on Objections to the Admissibility of Witness, Victim and Civil Party Statements and Case 001 Transcripts Proposed by the Co-Prosecutors and Civil Party Lead Co-Lawyers, E299, 15 August 2013. 88 Decision on Objections to Documents Proposed to be Put Before the Chamber in the CoProsecutors’ Annexes A1-A5 and to Documents Cited in Paragraphs of the Closing Order Relevant to the First Two Trial Segments of Case 002/01, E185, 9 April 2012; Decision on Objections Proposed to be Put before the Chamber in Co-Prosecutors’ Annexes A6-A11 and by the Other Parties, E185/1, 3 December 2012; Third Decision on Objections to Documents Proposed for Admission Before the Trial Chamber, E185/2, 12 August 2013; Decision on Objections to the Admissibility of Witness, Victim and Civil Party Statements and Case 001 Transcripts Proposed by the Co-Prosecutors and Civil Party Lead Co-Lawyers, E299, 15 August 2013. In addition to that evidence admitted in these written decisions, parties were also permitted to tender evidence through an individual appearing live (Notice to the Parties Regarding Revised Modalities of Questioning and Response to Co-Prosecutor’s Request for Clarification Regarding Use of Documents during Witness Testimony (E201) (TC), E201/2, 13 June 2012, para. 2). Case 002/01, Judgement, 7 August 2014 - Public 16