01005704 Case File No. 002/19-09-2007/ECCC/TC E313 substantive hearing in Case 002/01.174 The parties also had the opportunity to file separately 20-page submissions on the applicable law by 21 December 2012.175 In the event the parties did not avail themselves of this opportunity, they were free to make any submissions in the pages allotted for Closing Briefs or time allotted for Closing Statements.176 Subsequently, the Chamber twice extended the deadline for Closing Briefs, resulting in a 26 September 2013 deadline. The Chamber also extended each party’s page limit by 25 pages, clarifying that end notes did not count towards the page limit.177 71. On 17 June 2013, the Chamber notified the parties of the schedule for Closing Statements, allotting three days to the Co-Prosecutors, one day to the Civil Party Lead Co-Lawyers and two days to each of the Accused.178 The Civil Party Lead CoLawyers and the Co-Prosecutors were together provided a day for rebuttal and the Accused two hours each for rejoinder and final statements.179 Closing statements were initially scheduled for 30 days after the filing of Closing Briefs in one official language of the ECCC and later adjusted to 16-31 October 2013.180 In order to assist the parties in preparing for Closing Statements, the Chamber and the Defence Support Section provided the Accused access to interpreters.181 174 Further Notification of Modalities for Closing Briefs (TC), E163/5/4, 26 November 2012. Notification of Decision on Co-Prosecutors’ Request to Include Additional Crimes Sites within the Scope of Trial in Case 002/01 (E163) and Deadline for Submission of Applicable Law Portion of Closing Briefs (TC), E163/5, 8 October 2012, para. 4. 176 Further Notification of Modalities for Closing Briefs (TC), E163/5/4, 26 November 2012; T. 13 June 2013, pp. 27-28. 177 Adjusted Schedule for Closing Submissions (E295/1, E295/1/2, E295/1/3, E295/2 and E295/3) (TC), E295/4, 22 August 2013, para. 2 (extending the deadline to 19 September 2013); Response to Emailed Requests for Extension of Time (TC), E295/6, 12 September 2013, para. 5; Schedule for the Final Document and Other Hearings in Case 002/01, for the Questioning of the Accused and Response to Motions E263 and E288/1 (TC), E288/1/1, 17 June 2013; T. 23 July 2013, p. 71 (resulting in a 225 page limit for the Co-Prosecutors, a 125 page limit for each Accused and a 105 page limit for the Civil Party Lead Co-Lawyers) 178 Schedule for the Final Document and Other Hearings in Case 002/01, for the Questioning of the Accused and Response to Motions E263 and E288/1 (TC), E288/1/1, 17 June 2013; See also, Internal Rule 94; Adjusted Schedule for Closing Submissions (E295/1, E295/1/2, E295/1/3, E295/2 and E295/3) (TC), E295/4, 22 August 2013, para. 6. 179 Adjusted Schedule for Closing Submissions (E295/1, E295/1/2, E295/1/3, E295/2 and E295/3) (TC), E295/4, 22 August 2013, paras 4, 6; See also, Internal Rule 94. 180 Adjusted Schedule for Closing Submissions (E295/1, E295/1/2, E295/1/3, E295/2 and E295/3) (TC), E295/4, 22 August 2013, paras 5-6. 181 Adjusted Schedule for Closing Submissions (E295/1, E295/1/2, E295/1/3, E295/2 and E295/3) (TC), E295/4, 22 August 2013, para. 5;Response to E-mailed Requests for Extension of Time (TC), E295/6, 12 September 2013, para.4; See also, Decision on KHIEU Samphan Request for Declaration of 175 Case 002/01, Judgement, 7 August 2014 - Public 37