European legal and policy framework on immigration detention of children
vulnerability and to protect the rights of children in the
context of migration, the court held that states have an
obligation to take measures to promote “the well-being
and development of the child”.78
This call is supported by the views of several UN human
rights mechanisms, who consider immigration detention of children to never be in the best interests of the
child and to always constitute a violation of the rights of
the child. The UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention
stressed that additional justification – beyond merely
being a migrant in an irregular situation – is needed
for the detention of children.79 The UN Committee on
the Rights of the Child and the Special Rapporteur on
Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment have called on all states to cease
the detention of children on the basis of their immigration status, and to establish alternatives to detention in
law and in practice, in accordance with the best interests of the child and their right to liberty.80 Detention
of children on the sole basis of their or their parents’
migration status constitutes a child rights violation and
always contravenes the principle of the best interests
of the child, the Committee on the Rights of the Child
concludes.81 A similar call to end detention of migrant
children and their families has been addressed to UN
Member States by the Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on Migration of February 2017.82 UNHCR takes a similar position,83 as does
the OHCHR.84
78 IACtHR, Advisory Opinion OC-21/14, Rights and guarantees
of children in the context of migration and / or in need
international protection, 19 August 2014, para. 164.
79 UN, Report of the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention,
18 January 2010, A/HRC/13/30, para. 30.
80 UN, Committee on the Rights of the Child, Report of the
2012 Day of General Discussion: The Rights of all Children
in the Context of International Migration, paras. 79 and 84.
Human Rights Council, Report of the Special Rapporteur on
Torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or
punishment, A/HRC/28/68, 5 March 2015, para. 85.
81 UN, Committee on the Rights of the Child, Report of the
2012 Day of General Discussion: The Rights of all Children
in the Context of International Migration. On detention
of unaccompanied children see also UN, Committee
on the Rights of the Child, No. 6 (2005): Treatment of
Unaccompanied and Separated Children Outside their
Country of Origin, CRC/GC/2005/6, 1 September 2005,
para. 61.
82 UN, General Assembly, Note by the Secretary General
transmitting Report of the Special Representative of the
Secretary-General on Migration, 3 February 2017, A/71/728,
para. 52 (b).
83 UNHCR, Guidelines on the Applicable Criteria and
Standards relating to the Detention of Asylum-Seekers
and Alternatives to Detention, 2012, Guideline 9 (for
unaccompanied children) and UNHCR, UNHCR’s position
regarding the detention of refugee and migrant children in
the migration context, January 2017 (for all children in the
context of migration).
84 UN, Office of the Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR),
Situation of migrants in transit, A/HRC/31/35, 27 January
2015, paras. 44-45.
30
Soft law calling for an end to immigration detention of
children dates back more than a decade, particularly
for unaccompanied children. Such calls are increasing
rapidly. An illustration of this trend is the forthcoming
Joint General Comment on the Human Rights of Children in the Context of International Migration, currently
under preparation by the Committee on the Protection
of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of
Their Families and the Committee on the Rights of the
Child, which is also expected to confirm that immigration detention is never in the best interests of the child
and constitutes a child rights violation. The Joint General
Comment is expected to call on states to expeditiously
and completely stop detaining children on the basis on
their, or their parents’, immigration status and to instead
implement community-based alternatives.85
Conclusion
A person’s right to liberty and security, as enshrined in
EU, Council of Europe and UN instruments, is a fundamental right. Any restriction of this right must respect the
requirements established by international, European and
domestic law, which are particularly strict for children.
Neither EU law nor the ECHR prohibit immigration
detention of children. The stringent requirements flowing from the Charter and the case law of the European
Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) mean, however, that
only in exceptional cases depriving children of liberty
will be in line with EU law.
85 See Joint General comment No. 3 of the Committee on
the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and
Members of Their Families and No. 21 of the Committee on
the Rights of the Child on the Human Rights of Children in
the Context of International Migration, draft, 24 April 2017.
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents