into account by the examining officer and the complainant will be heard orally if the Minister considers it necessary. Since the request for asylum was considered prior to the entry into force of the Immigration and Protection of Refugee’s Law, that is prior to June 2002, the immigration agent will not be restricted to assessing facts after the denial of the initial request but will be able to examine all the facts and information old and new presented by the complainant. In this context, it contests the Committee’s finding in paragraph 7.5 of its decision which found that only new information could be considered during such a review. Complainant’s response On 5 February 2007, the complainant forwarded the Committee a copy of the results of his risk assessment, in which his request was denied and he was asked to leave the State party. No further information was provided. Case Dadar, 258/2004 Nationality and country of removal if applicable Iranian to Iran Views adopted on 3 November 2005 Issues and violations found Removal - article 3 Interim measures granted and State party response Yes and State party acceded Remedy recommended The Committee urges the State party, in accordance with rule 112, paragraph 5, of its rules of procedure, to inform it, within 90 days of the date of the transmittal of this decision, of the steps taken in response to the decision expressed above. Due date for State party response 26 February 2006 Date of reply Latest reply 5 April 2007 (Had previously responded on 22 March 2006 and 24 April 2006 see annual report A/61/44 - and 9 August 2006). 105