Committee’s decision No further consideration under the follow-up procedure as the State party has complied with the Committee’s decision. Case 262/2005, Losizkaja Nationality and country of removal if applicable Belarusian to Belarus Views adopted on 20 November 2006 Issues and violations found Removal - article 3 Interim measures granted and State party response Granted and acceded to by the State party Remedy recommended The complainant’s removal to Belarus by the State party would constitute a breach of article 3 of the Convention 10. The Committee urges the State party, in accordance with rule 112, paragraph 5, of its rules of procedure, to inform it, within 90 days from the date of the transmittal of this decision, of the steps taken in response to the views expressed above. Due date for State party response 27 February 2007 Date of reply 23 March 2007 State party response The State party informed the Committee that the complainant has now received permission to stay in Switzerland (specific type of permission not provided) and no longer risks removal to Belarus. Committee’s decision No further consideration under the follow-up procedure, as the State party has complied with the Committee’s decision. Case 280/2005, El Rgeig Nationality and country of removal if applicable Libyan, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Views adopted on 15 November 2006 Issues and violations found Removal - article 3 134