Views adopted on
15 November 1994
Issues and violations found
Removal - article 3
Interim measures granted and State party
response
Requested and acceded to by the State party
Remedy recommended
The State party has an obligation to refrain from
forcibly returning Tahir Hussain Khan to Pakistan.
Due date for State party response
None
Date of reply
None
State party response
No information provided to Rapporteur, however
during the discussion of the State party report to
the Committee against Torture in May 2005, the
State party stated that the complainant had not
been deported.
Complainant’s response
None
Case
Falcon Rios, 133/1999
Nationality and country of removal
if applicable
Mexican to Mexico
Views adopted on
30 November 2004
Issues and violations found
Removal - article 3
Interim measures granted and State party
response
Requested and acceded to by the State party
Remedy recommended
Relevant measures
Due date for State party response
None
Date of reply
None
State party response
On 9 March 2005, the State party provided
information on follow-up. It stated that the
complainant had submitted a request for a risk
assessment prior to return to Mexico and that the
State party will inform the Committee of the
outcome. If the complainant can establish one of
the motives for protection under the Immigration
and Protection of Refugee’s Law, he will be able
to present a request for permanent residence in
Canada. The Committee’s decision will be taken
104
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents