State party response Pursuant to the Committee’s request for follow-up information of 25 March 2005, the State party informed the Committee that, by reason of the unlawful character of the decision to return him, the complainant was granted temporary admission on 21 June 1994. Subsequently, having married a Swiss national, the complainant was granted a residence permit on 20 June 1997. Complainant’s response None Committee’s decision No further consideration under the follow-up procedure as the State party has complied with the Committee’s decision. Case Alan, 21/1995 Nationality and country of removal if applicable Turkish to Turkey Views adopted on 8 May 1996 Issues and violations found Removal - article 3 Interim measures granted and State party response Granted and acceded to by the State party Remedy recommended The State party has an obligation to refrain from forcibly returning Ismail Alan to Turkey. Due date for State party response None Date of reply 25 May 2005 State party response Pursuant to the Committee’s request of 25 March 2005 for follow-up information, the State party informed the Committee that the complainant was granted asylum by decision of 14 January 1999. Complainant’s response None Committee’s decision No further consideration under the follow-up procedure as the State party has complied with the Committee’s decision. 132