74 although he submitted all the necessary documents, the legal deadline for issuance being exceeded. The petitioner specified that the officials of the Buzău City Hall justified their refusal to issue the birth certificate by the fact that his wife, a Belgian citizen, did not change her identity card following the marriage and she does not appear in the database with the name for which she opted at the moment of the marriage in Romania. Both the petitioner and his wife stated that they requested the support of the local authority for the correct understanding of the situation they are facing, namely the impossibility of changing the identity document of the wife in correlation with the name obtained after the marriage, this situation being caused by the state specific legislation of the Belgian State who establishes the obligation of the woman – a Belgian citizen – to keep her last name, acquired at birth, throughout her life, regardless of the number of marriages concluded. In view of the situation created, we considered it appropriate to turn to the Directorate for Persons Record and the Administration of Databases Bucharest, which informed the officials of the Buzău City Hall that the birth certificate of the son of the petitioner can be issued. The petitioner informed us subsequently that he came into possession of his son's birth certificate. File no. 446/2019 The petitioner notified the Ploiești Territorial Office regarding the delay in correcting a property title, by administrative means, as provided for in the provisions of the Order no. 700/2014 to A.N.C.P.I. regarding the approval of the Regulation of approval, reception and registration in the cadaster and land records. At the same time, the petitioner specified that although it had been three years since he had submitted numerous written requests to rectify this error, he was not given the properly corrected property title, being unable to discuss the succession after the death of his father. The County Commission for Land Fund Dâmbovița has approved the revocation of the wrong title of property and the issuance of a new title on the correct name of the petitioner. The institution of the Prefect of Dâmbovița County has indicated to us that all the documentation was submitted to the Office of Cadaster and Real Estate Advertising in Dâmbovița, in order to issue the new title of property. Recommendations ignored by authorities: File no. 279/2019 In June 2019, an investigation was carried out at the Medical Social Unit Boldești Scăeni, Prahova county, following the petitions received both at the headquarters of the People's Advocate Institution and at the Ploiești Territorial Office, regarding the desperate situation of a 82 years old person, who, after his discharge from the Ploiesti Psychiatric Hospital, was no longer admitted to this unit. During the investigation were found irregularities, and to remedy them was issued Recommendation no. 41/2019 regarding the revision of the Regulation of the internal order, and of the operational procedures in order to improve the way of carrying out the activities, to respect the right to health of the beneficiaries and to avoid similar situations, in the future. Both during the checks and after the issuance of Recommendation no. 41/2019 to the management of the U.A.M.S. Boldești Scăeni, difficulties were encountered, as the requested documents were made available to us with delay, some of them were in draft form (without being signed, stamped, registered) or were not prepared in accordance with the provisions of Order no. 600/2018 of the General Secretariat of the Government. Moreover, some procedures were not developed and implemented even after the recommendation was issued. As the recommendation was not fully accepted by the management of the U.A.M.S. Boldești Scăeni, the City Hall of Boldești Scăeni was notified. PEOPLE’S ADVOCATE ANNUAL REPORT 2019