CAT/C/49/D/425/2010 7.3 The Committee takes note of the State party’s argument that the communication should be declared inadmissible as manifestly ill-founded. The Committee notes that on 13 July 2011, the complainant voluntarily left the State party for Egypt and concludes therefore that with his departure to Egypt the communication before the Committee no longer serves any purpose and has by that fact turned out to be incompatible with the provisions of the Convention in accordance with article 22, paragraph 2, as he is no longer at any risk of being sent back to Algeria by the State party. 8. The Committee therefore decides: (a) That the communication is inadmissible under article 22, paragraph 2, of the Convention; (b) That this decision shall be communicated to the complainant and to the State party. [Adopted in English, French and Spanish, the English text being the original version. Subsequently to be issued also in Arabic, Chinese and Russian as part of the Committee’s annual report to the General Assembly.] 9