The Death Penalty in the OSCE Area 47
Most serious crimes
General Comment No. 6 states that the term most serious crimes must be read restrictively to mean that the death penalty should be an exceptional measure. The
ECOSOC Safeguards specify that the scope of the crimes punishable by the death
penalty should not go beyond intentional crimes with lethal or other extremely grave
consequences. The Human Rights Committee has gone further than this, stating that
the imposition of the death penalty for crimes that do not result in loss of life would
be contrary to the ICCPR.72 Resolution 2005/59 of the Commission on Human
Rights states that the death penalty should neither be imposed for non-violent acts
– such as financial crimes, religious practice or expression of conscience, or sexual
relations between consenting adults – nor as a mandatory sentence.73
In a manner not contrary to the provisions of the ICCPR and pursuant to a final
judgement rendered by a competent court
States parties are obliged to rigorously observe all the fair-trial guarantees set out in
Article 14 of the ICCPR. The Human Rights Committee is of the opinion that a
violation of the right to life would result from an execution following a trial that fails
to ensure the right to a fair hearing by an independent tribunal, the presumption of
innocence, the minimum guarantees for the defence, and the right to review by a
higher tribunal.74 The ECOSOC Safeguards and Resolution 2005/59 of the Commission on Human Rights also state that all legal proceedings should comply with
Article 14 of the ICCPR.75
Right to seek pardon or commutation
The term pardon means the removal of a death sentence and release, while the term
commutation means the substitution of a death sentence with a less severe sentence.
The right to seek pardon or commutation has been reaffirmed by General Comment
No. 6, the ECOSOC Safeguards, and Resolution 2005/59 of the Commission on
Human Rights.
72
73
74
CCPR/C/79/Add. 25, 3 August 1993.
Resolution of the UN Commission on Human Rights 2005/59, 20 April 2005, para. f.
General Comment No. 6.
75 The special rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary and arbitrary executions has stated that the process leading to the
imposition of the death penalty must also comply with Articles 9 and 15 of the ICCPR.
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents