61 Bibliography International Books and articles Birtles, A., ‘The European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and the electronic recording of police interviews with suspects’, Human Rights Law Review, 1, no.1 (2001). Burgers, JH. and Danelius, H., The United Nations Convention Against Torture: A Handbook on the Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman, Or Degrading Treatment Or Punishment (Martinus Nijhoff, 1988). Danziger, Shai, Levav, Jonathan, and Avnaim-Pesso, Liora, ‘Extraneous factors in judicial decisions’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 108 no. 17 (2011). Fair Trials, ‘A Measure of Last Resort? The practice of pre-trial detention decision making in the EU’ (April 2016). Fair Trials, ‘Advancing Defence Rights in the EU’ (31 March 2014). Fair Trials, ‘The Disappearing Trial: Towards a rights-based approach to trial waiver systems’ (2017). Fair Trials, ‘The Practice of Pre-trial Detention Decision-Making’ (2017). Gerrity, E., Keane, T. M. and Tuma, F. (eds.), The Mental Health Consequences of Torture (Springer, 2001). Mendez, Juan E., ‘How International Law Can Eradicate Torture: A Response to Cynics’, Southwestern Journal of International Law, 22, no. 2 (2016). Nowak, M. and McArthur, E., The United Nations Convention Against Torture: A Commentary (Oxford University Press, 2008). Ntanda Nsereko, Daniel D., ‘The Poisoned Tree: Responses to Involuntary Confessions in Criminal Proceedings in Botswana, Uganda, and Zambia’, African Journal of International and Comparative Law, 5 (1993). Pasara, Luis, ‘Pre-trial detention and the exercise of judicial independence: A comparative analysis’, Due Process of the Law Foundation (2013). Sullivan, T. P., ‘Electronic Recording of Custodial Interrogations: Everybody Wins’, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 95, no. 3 (2005). Taslitz, A. E., ‘High Expectations and Some Wounded Hopes: The Policy and Politics of a Uniform Statute on Videotaping Custodial Interrogations’, Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy, 7 (2012). Thaman, Stephen C., Exclusionary Rules in Comparative Law (Springer, 2012). Thommen, M. and Samadi, M., ‘The Bigger the Crime, the Smaller the Chance of a Fair Trial? Evidence Exclusion in Serious Crime Cases Under Swiss, Dutch and European Human Rights Law’, European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law & Criminal Justice, 24 (2016). Case law Arrest Warrant of 11 April 2000 (DRC v Belgium). Deolall v Guyana, CCPR/C/82/D/912/2000, 5 November 2004. El Haski v Belgium, App no. 649/08 (ECtHR, 25 September 2012-9). Foucher v France, App no. 22209/93 (ECtHR, 18 March 1997). Gäfgen v Germany, App no. 22978/05 (ECtHR, 1 June 2010). GK v Switzerland (unreported), 12 May 2003, Communication No 219/2002. Guerra de la Espriella v Colombia, CCPR/C/98/D/1623/2007, UN Human Rights Committee (HRC), 11 May 2010. Gunes v Turkey, App no. 28490/95 (ECtHR, 19 June 2003). Haci Özen v Turkey, App no. 46286/99, 12 April 2007. Hermi v Italy, App no. 18114/02 (ECtHR, 18 October 2006). Jalloh v Germany, App no. 54810/00 (ECtHR, 11 July 2006). Jasper v the United Kingdom, App no. 27052/95 (ECtHR, 16 February 2000). John Murray v United Kingdom, App no. 18731/91 (ECtHR, 8 February 1996). Joyce Nawila Chiti v Zambia, Communication no. 1303/2004, UN Doc CCPR/C/105/D/1303/2004, 28 August 2012. Juvenile Reeducation Institute v Paraguay (Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations and Costs) Ser C no 112 (IACtHR, 2 September 2004). Levinta v Moldova, App no. 17332/03, 16 December 2008.