t0rrOriSt
examined
C.3666
was appointed
by a doctor
appointed
&
by the court.
Suspected
by the judiciary.
terrorists
were
of the m
153. In connection
with thet issue,
members of the Committee wished to receive
information
concerning the activities
and accomplishments to date as well as
the future plans of the Institute
for Women.
They also wished to know whether
the Institute
could receive oomplaints of discrimination
on grounds of sex
and, if so, what action it could take: whether there was any case law with
regard to violations
of the principle
of equality
between the sexes; whether a
woman could accede to the throne; what factors had impeded progress in
of women in the
achieving equality
between the sexes: what was the proportion
education oystem, particularly
at the university
level: what the authorities
had done to put an end to the practice
of traffic
in women along the border
with Portugal;
r.nd lastly
why, according to article
14 of the Constitution,
only Spaniard7 appeared to enjoy equality
before the law.
154. In reply, the representative
noted that a number of major changes had
been made recently
in the Civil Code and the Labour Relations Code to promote
non-discrimination,
that maternity
and paternity
leave had been Liberalieed
and that steps had been taken to enforce the payment of alimony.
Measures had
also been taken in 1989/90 to make it easier for women to join the armed
force,
and the G&%di.a Civi&
forces, the state 60CUrity
Sexist 6tereOtypaS
had been eliminated from school textbooks and particula;
attention
was being
paid to the portrayal
of women in advertising.
The Institute
for Womenhad
achieved Considerable progress in the promotion of equality:
for example, mere
and more women were passing the civil
service entrance examinations.
The,
repreaentatrve
said he had no knowledge of any traffic
in women along f&e
border with Portugal,
but recently
a crime network selling people into
prostitution
had been unmaoked.
the representative
explained that the
155, Rep?.ping to other qU6StiOn6,
reference in article
14 of the Constitution
to “Spaniards” should be read in
conjunction with article
13 (:), which stated that aliens in Spain enjoyed
public freedoms,, guaranteed in treaties
and the law. The employment situation
of women had improved spectacularly
and the number of women in the education
system
was certainly
over 50 per cent.
Although it wa8 not impossible for a
-omen to accede to the throne of Spain, there was an explicit
bias in favour
of men; the present King of Spain had a male heir, so the throne could not
pass to a woman.
.
t to lJ&
156. With reference to that issue, members of the Committee wished to know
whether there were any plans by Spain to ratify
the Second Optional Protocol,
aiming at the abolition
of the death penalty} whether the authorities
intended
to amend the Code of Military
JUStiC6
to limit the number of capital offences;
whether the Code of Military
Justice could be applied to civilian6
in certain
wheihor the death penalty was applicable
also to offences under
situations;
the Code of Military
Justice in case6 where war had not been officially
declared or hostilities
had not begun, or in a civil
war-l whether appeal could
be made to a civil
court against a death sentence pronounced by a military
court and, if so, which civil
court
would hear the appeal; and, with regard to
-38-
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents