revenues and services”, the amount of 30,000 lei was provided, of which 26,837 lei were spent for the maintenance of green areas in 2018. ► The Field regarding prevention of torture in detention places enforced the provisions of art. 47 of Law no. 35/1997, republished, as subsequently amended and supplemented, notifying criminal prosecution bodies when, in the exercise of its attributions, it had established the existence of clues on the perpetration of crimes. For instance: ● The field regarding prevention of torture in detention places informed the Prosecutor’s Office attached to the Court of Bucharest pursuant to the spot visit to the Preventive Detention and Arrest Centre no. 1 of Bucharest, where the failure to observe the legal provisions regarding the immediate submission of notes finding traumatic marks to the relevant prosecutors’ offices was mentioned, as stipulated in art. 32 par. (2) of O.M.A.I. No. 14/2018 on the approval of the Rules of organization and operation of preventive detention and arrest centres, as well as the required measures for their safety. It was found that the submission interval ranged from 5 hours to about 3 months. Based on the answer received from the Prosecutor’s Office attached to the Court of Bucharest, its records included no causes corresponding to the submitted data. Measures will be taken in order to identify the submission of notes finding traumatic marks by the preventive detention and arrest centre, as well as the solution decided on this by criminal prosecution bodies. ● The field regarding prevention of torture in detention places performed a visit to the Preventive Detention and Arrest Centre of I.P.J. Constanta, when it was found that ten persons deprived from freedom showed traumatic injuries (excoriations, ecchymoses, haematoma, tumefactions, plagues), occurring prior to the imprisonment process, with the finding notes drawn up by the medical staff being sent to criminal prosecution bodies, i.e. the Prosecutor’s Office attached to the Court of Constanta and the Prosecutor’s Office attached to the Judge’s Office of Constanta. Pursuant to the visit, the People’s Advocate Institution asked the Prosecutor’s Office attached to the Court of Constanta and the Prosecutor’s Office attached to the Judge’s Office of Constanta to provide information on the solutions decided in these 56