The Death Penalty in the OSCE Area
Grunov on 4 April 2014.122 In line with its internal regulations, the Human Rights
Committee issued interim measures of protection, requesting Belarus to stay the
executions for the time of consideration of the communications. The Republic of
Belarus considers this procedure to contradict its national law.123
The UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Belarus stated
that “concern remains regarding due process in death penalty cases heard before
closed doors and prejudice towards defendants publicized by the highest level of
power”.124 The Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions
underlined that the proceedings in death penalty cases should meet the highest level
of respect of fair trial and due process safeguards and urged Belarus to ensure these
safeguards.125 He also recalled “that executions in secret violate international human
rights law standards regarding the imposition of the death penalty”, and that the
provision of information about executions in advance to the convicted persons, their
families and lawyers is a crucial requirement of due process.126
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA****
In the United States, 20 states: Alaska, Connecticut, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Maine,
Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, New
York, North Dakota, Ohio, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia and
Wisconsin, as well as the District of Columbia, have abolished the death penalty, or
introduced a moratorium either in law or in practice, or have suspended executions.
The abolition of capital punishment in New Mexico, Connecticut and Maryland is
not retroactive; therefore, inmates still remain on death row in these states. During
the reporting period, two states introduced temporary moratoria on executions. On
11 February 2014, the Governor of the State of Washington proclaimed a moratorium
on carrying out the death penalty in the state, saying that capital punishment was
122 Ibid.
123 Ibid.
124 Report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Belarus, A/HRC/26/44, 22 April 2014. On 14
October 2013, following calls on Belarus to abolish the death penalty issued on the World Day against the Death Penalty,
President Alexander Lukashenko publicly justified the use of the death penalty in Belarus. He stated that some crimes
were so grave that they could not be forgiven. “Offenders understand it only when you talk to them in their language,”
he explained. (“Belarus: Lukashenko fully justifies death penalty”, Against Death Penalty in the World, 14 October 2013,
<http://english.nessunotocchicaino.it/archivio_news/201310.php?iddocumento=17311161&mover=0>).
125 A/HRC/26/36/Add.2, op. cit., note 101.
126 Ibid.
30
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents