In a striking admission, the minister’s delegate concluded that the reports “presented a
credible basis for calling into question the extent to which the Egyptian government
would honor its assurances.”157
Those reports included information from Human Rights Watch and others regarding the
December 2001 expulsion from Sweden of Ahmed Agiza, an Egyptian asylum seeker,
who was subsequently held incommunicado, tortured and subjected to an unfair retrial
upon return to Egypt. The Egyptian authorities had given the Swedish government
assurances that Agiza would not be tortured and would be afforded a fair trial. The
delegate in the Mahjoub case alleged that Mahjoub and Agiza were associates. Agiza was
also tried in absentia in Egypt in April 1999 (see section below on Sweden).
Despite the government’s admission of Mahjoub’s risk of torture, the delegate
determined that Mahjoub should not be allowed to remain in Canada because he posed
an “extraordinary danger” to Canada’s security and thus fell within the provisions of the
refoulement exception to Canada’s Immigration and Refugee Protection Act.158
In quashing the delegate’s determination and sending the case back for redetermination
with a view to establishing a proper evidentiary record, the judge in Mahjoub expressed
skepticism about the Suresh “exception:”
The Supreme Court of Canada has left the issue open by not excluding
the possibility that, in exceptional circumstances, such deportation may
be justified, either as a consequence of the balancing process required by
section 7 of the Charter or under section 1 of the Charter. There are,
however, powerful indicia that deportation to face torture is conduct
fundamentally unacceptable; conduct that shocks the Canadian
conscience and therefore violates fundamental justice in a manner that
can not be justified under…the Charter.159
157
Ibid., para. 33.
158
Section 115. [Principle of Non-Refoulement] (1) A protected person or a person who is recognized as a
Convention refugee by another country to which the person may be returned shall not be removed from Canada
to a country where they would be at risk of persecution for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership in
a particular social group or political opinion or at risk of torture or cruel and unusual treatment or punishment.
Exceptions [to the Principle of Non-Refoulement] (2) Subsection (1) does not apply in the case of a person
(a) who is inadmissible on grounds of serious criminality and who constitutes, in the opinion of the Minister, a
danger to the public in Canada; or
(b) who is inadmissible on grounds of security, violating human or international rights or organized criminality if,
in the opinion of the Minister, the person should not be allowed to remain in Canada on the basis of the nature
and severity of acts committed or of danger to the security of Canada.
[online] http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/I-2.5/ (retrieved February 26, 2005).
159
Mahjoub, para. 64.
HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH VOL. 17 NO. 4(D)
54
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents