Long-term deprivation of liberty 72. The implementation of the disciplinary regime is examined during visits. As a result, various suggestions were put forward to the competent administrations (these had still not been responded to at the date of finalising this report), such that the successive use of more than one group-separation measure should not exceed the maximum period of 7 days and, where exceeded, that the inmate should be able to leave the room for a minimum period of 12 hours. In addition, inmates who have been separated from the group should have access to two hours of outdoor time to be arranged flexibly (Marcelo Nessi and Sograndio CMI). The Suggestions have been accepted. Implementation of disciplinary regime §249, 252 and 253 AR 2014 In the Las Moreras CMI it was observed that the results of disciplinary proceedings due to serious or very serious incidents, through which the group-separation measure is imposed, are not communicated to the lawyers acting on behalf of detained minors. The conclusion has been accepted and measures taken as a result. Library in the Las Moreras CMI (Murcia) 73. Various shortcomings have been picked up in the use of restraint measures. In the Las Moreras CMI the temporary isolation of a minor is not considered a restraint method. A Suggestion was therefore put forward which has been accepted. In the Virgen de Valvanera CMI temporary isolation is not recorded as such, justified by the decision to initiate the disciplinary report in which provisional separation is agreed a posteriori. This way of proceeding means that the use of temporary isolation as a restraint measure does not require authorisation by the director or immediate communication in the case of emergency, nor communication to the juvenile court judge of the adoption and termination of the measure, nor of the motives and reasons for keeping a minor in isolation. In the Sograndio CMI, restraint measures are carried out by security personnel in the absence of an educator. The competent administrations have accepted the NPM criteria. Shortcomings in the use of restraint measures §153 AR 2012 §254 AR 2014 65