CAT/C/56/D/604/2014 complainant’s case, in the absence of any particular circumstances adduced by him in support of such an assumption.42 7.4 The Committee is therefore of the view that domestic remedies have not been exhausted in accordance with article 22 (5) (b), of the Convention. 8. Accordingly, the Committee decides: (a) That the communication is inadmissible; (b) That this decision shall be communicated to the State party and to the complainant. 42 18 See communication No. 307/2006, E.Y. v. Canada, decision of inadmissibility adopted 4 November 2009, para. 9.3.