administration and were given recommendations how to eliminate such shortcomings and to improve the documentation. During the visit to PU No. 19 of the noted Office, administrative areas of the facility were also checked, but no person brought to the custody was found. While reviewing the registration book on the persons brought to the police custody, it was found that there were numerous changes in dates and hours, columns for measures undertaken left unfilled and the documentation about persons brought to the police custody were neglected. At the same time, the facilities’ administration were given relevant suggestions in relation to effective ensuring rights of persons brought to the police custody and even those, who were considered as suspects. The MIA requested to the MIA with regard to the outcomes of the visit. 19 During the visit to Surakhani DPO TDP, it were held private meetings with 3 persons detained in this facility. In the course of the meetings with detainees, they had not expressed dissatisfaction with detention conditions and treatment. However, two of them submitted the NPG members their applications to the Ombudsman about bias criminal investigations. In the frame of this visit, it was found that general condition in the TDP was in satisfactory state; however, books on medical and other records were not well-documented, because there were no bulletin boards in cells displaying the detainees’ rights and duties and the detainees were not provided with hygienic cleaning tools. The administrations of Surakhani DPO and TDP were given appropriate suggestions in respect to the elimination of the abovementioned shortcomings at the administrative level. During the visit conducted to Nizami DPO TDP, the NPG got familiarized with the state of treatment and ensuring the detainees’ rights and freedoms, custody condition and the documentation confirming the legality of their detention. During the conversation with 3 detainees in the facility, despite there were no complaints about detention condition and treatment, it were revealed deficiencies in the documentation and in TDP, itself. Hence, cells have not been supplied with bulletin boards displaying detainees’ rights and duties and the detained persons were not provided with hygienic cleaning tools; records on phone calls were not well-documented; medicines in the medical unit of the facility were out of the date; and although, it was issued a medical certificate for one of the detainees with regard his medical examination taking while he was brought to the custody, the personal medical record book did not display any information in this regard. 19 See ibid. 19