the level of police departments and police officers of the facility were legally trained. The MIA has been requested with regard to the findings of the visit. 27 NPG members conducted visit to Bilasuvar DPD TDP. The purpose of this visit was to assess the condition and treatment, ensuring the detainees’ rights under the Law on Detainees and IDR of Temporary Detention Places and to check the relevant documentation. During the visit, nutrition, access to drinking hot and cold water, healthcare, walking, meeting, phone and parcel services, and rules on release out of cell, detention conditions and the documentation confirming the legality of detentions were monitored in order to assess the general detention condition of the TDP; the existed shortcomings were also investigated on the spot. Furthermore, 8 detainees were met privately by the NPG members. It has been found that despite it was a summer time, in the facility cooling and ventilation systems were working properly. The detainees in this facility did not complain of custody condition and treatment; also, they were informed of their rights and Ombudsman’s competences recognized by the Constitutional Law and were given legal consultations. The detainees did not have any complaints regarding condition and treatment. In the line with national and international laws, the administration of the facility was given suggestions with regard to better improvement of custody condition in conformity with the IDR of Temporary Detention Places and to the elimination of the existed shortcomings. For the assessment of custody condition in Jalilabad DPD TDP, the NPG members conducted scheduled and ad-hoc visits. Meanwhile, it was discovered that heating and ventilation systems were working properly, nutrition, access to drinking hot and cold water, healthcare, walking, meeting, phone and parcel services, rules on release out of cell, conditions, the documentation about the legality of a detainee’s release were checked; Group members met with 16 detainees in private and face-to-face. The detainees did not complain of condition and treatment; they were informed about their rights and Ombudsman’s competences; and each of them was legally consulted. The visit concluded with the visit of administration of the facility and they were given suggestions related to better improvement of custody condition in conformity with national and international laws and the IDR of Temporary Detention Places and to the elimination of the existed shortcomings. 27 See pp. 25-27 24