Defence rights 10 Freedom of movement 8 Confidentiality 8 Right to information 8 2 10 1.82% 10 1.82% 8 1.46% 8 1.46% 4 0.73% 3 0.56% 2 0.36% 2 0.36% Welfare rights 4 Freedom of conscience 2 Right to individual expression 2 Unjustified detention 1 Image rights 1 1 0.18% Staff working conditions 1 1 0.18% Privacy 1 1 0.18% Other 2 2 0.36% 549 100% TOTAL 508 1 1 18 17 6 2.2.3 On-Site Verifications The Legislature has approved the procedure implemented at the CGLPL’s initiative in order to enable it to properly fulfil its preventive duties. Article 6-1 thus provides that the CGLPL “may conduct verifications, on-site if necessary” and article 8-1 grants the same prerogatives to inspectors acting within the framework of inspections and within the framework of on-site verifications. Both the inspection and on-site verification methods of action are based upon an internal mode of organisation involving two specialised but complementary groups: inspectors in charge of inspections and inspectors in charge of referred cases (and therefore onsite verifications). The unchanged number of inspectors in charge of referred cases, combined with the emphasis placed upon more rapid handling thereof, did not enable the number of on-site verifications to be increased as much as hoped. Between January and November 2014 the CGLPL thus conducted five on-site verifications concerning either one person (three on-site verifications), or a group of persons (two). In any case, even when these procedures only concern an individual situation, they always form a part of broader overall reflection with regard to a particular issue. Four were conducted in an unexpected manner and one was scheduled (advance notice of two working days) in order both to enable the person concerned to prepare the elements that they wished to bring to the attention of the CGLPL, and the management to gather together the documents requested by the CGLPL. The CGLPL thus delegated between two and three inspectors in order to conduct on-site verifications under the following circumstances: - 66 the situation of a young adult imprisoned in the prison of Fresnes with a view to ensuring proper balance between the security measures implemented and respect for their dignity, as well as the practical details of their psychiatric treatment. The lifting of medical secrecy as provided for under the final paragraph of article 8-1 of the amended Act of 30th October 2007 was requested within the framework of this inquiry. An inspector with the status of doctor was thus delegated in order to consult the medical record of the person concerned and engage in exchanges with the psychiatrist, head of the UHSA centre and of the SMPR. Prior agreement was given by the person concerned in writing. During this phase, no other inspector was present and the medical information was not passed on internally. Only the doctor inspector’s conclusions were re-transcribed in the