(a) The recruitment of part-time “peasant soldiers”, who continue to live in their communities but participate in armed action against guerrillas, so that they and their communities may be the target of action by the illegal armed groups, including acts of torture and ill-treatment; (b) Constitutional reform bill No. 223/2003, which, if adopted, would seem to confer judicial powers on the armed forces and enable persons to be detained and questioned for up to 36 hours without being brought before a judge. 68. The Committee also expresses its concern at: (a) The climate of impunity that surrounds human rights violations by State security forces and organs and, in particular, the absence of prompt, impartial and thorough investigation of the numerous acts of torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment and the absence of redress and adequate compensation for the victims; (b) The allegations of tolerance, support or acquiescence by the State party’s agents concerning the activities of the paramilitary groups known as “self-defence groups”, which are responsible for a great deal of torture or ill-treatment; (c) The judicial reform bill, should it be approved, would reportedly provide for constitutional limitation of amparo proceedings and reduce the powers of the Constitutional Court, particularly with respect to the review of declarations of states of emergency. Similarly, the Committee expresses its concern at the “alternative penalties” bill, which, if approved, would, even if they had committed torture or other serious breaches of international humanitarian law, grant conditional suspension of their sentences to members of armed groups who voluntarily laid down their arms; (d) The allegations and information indicating: (i) That some prosecutors in the Human Rights Unit of the Public Prosecutor’s Office have been forced to resign and that members of the Unit have been threatened in connection with their investigation of cases of human rights violations; (ii) Inadequate protection against rape and other forms of sexual violence, which are allegedly frequently used as forms of torture or ill-treatment. The Committee further expresses its concern at the fact that the new Military Penal Code does not expressly exclude sexual offences from the jurisdiction of the military courts; (iii) The fact that the military courts are allegedly still, despite the promulgation of the new Military Penal Code and the Constitutional Court’s decision of 1997 that crimes against humanity did not fall within the jurisdiction of the military courts, investigating offences that are totally excluded from their competence, such as torture, genocide and forced disappearance in which members of the police or armed forces are suspected of having been involved; 35