132. The Committee welcomes with appreciation the additional written and oral information provided, as well as the attendance of a high-level delegation, which demonstrates the State party’s willingness to maintain an open and fruitful dialogue with the Committee. B. Positive aspects 133. The Committee notes with appreciation: (a) The adoption of the 1999 Extradition Act, responding to the Committee’s previous recommendations; (b) The cooperation undertaken with the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees and the willingness to comply with its guidelines and recommendations; (c) That the Mangere Accommodation Centre can be considered to be more of an open centre than a detention centre; (d) The Police Detention Legal Assistance Scheme, which provides for initial free legal advice to be obtained by persons in police custody; (e) Legislative and administrative developments that enhance compliance with the Convention, in particular the 2000 Protocol between the Department of Corrections and the Ombudsman’s Office, the 1998 amendment to the Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters Act, and the 2000 International Crimes and International Criminal Court Act; (f) Measures taken to improve the effectiveness and strengthen the independence of the Police Complaints Authority; (g) The efforts undertaken to promote a positive relationship between the police and Maori; (h) Facilities; The efforts undertaken to establish new Child, Youth and Family Residential (i) The ongoing elaboration of a national plan of action on human rights by the Human Rights Commission; (j) The declared intent to withdraw reservations to the Convention against Torture and the Convention on the Rights of the Child, and to ratify the Optional Protocol to the former Convention. C. Subjects of concern 134. The Committee expresses concern about: (a) The fact that the immigration legislation does not include the non-refoulement obligation provided for in article 3 of the Convention; 62