 For example, there were cases when a person’s application was rejected on the ground that there isn’t a sufficient number of security officers.  In another case, the PS allowed a person deprived of liberty to use the services of a doctor of his choosing at his expense (to undergo coronarography and computer tomography), which had to be organized in a medical subdivision of the healthcare authorities. The performance of the indicated examinations was, however, delayed on the ground that the number of security officers was insufficient for the additional post. Access to Free Health Care 2.3.24. Sufficient state funding shall be provided for the necessary medical interventions to be performed in respect of persons deprived of liberty. 2.3.25. Medical examinations or other medical interventions indicated to persons deprived of liberty, which are carried out as part of the state-guaranteed free-of-charge and concessional health care and services, shall be organized and delivered in a reasonable period and without unnecessary delays. Preliminary (External) Medical Examination 2.3.26. Persons deprived of liberty shall, upon their entry into a PI, undergo a mandatory medical inspection, the results of which shall be properly documented. 2.3.27. Proper conditions shall be secured for carrying out medical inspections of persons deprived of liberty. 2.3.28. Medical inspections shall be carried out by a doctor only, outside of sound of the PI staff, and unless the doctor 23   

Select target paragraph3

Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents