31 Selected topics from 2019 Inmates placed in restraints do not receive medical assistance from the specialist health service, but from the local accident and emergency unit or from the prison health service. Doctors from the accident and emergency unit do not have expertise in the use of restraints, and the review of the prison health service’s procedures revealed major shortcomings. On a national level, restraint beds were only used on an average of 15 times per year. This entails a risk that prison officers with little or no previous ­experience with restraints must use this highly intrusive measure on inmates in acute psychological crisis. Discrimination The use of restraints to prevent people from harming themselves is a contentious issue. The UN Special Rapporteur against Torture has stated that persons with mental illnesses should not be subjected to such forms of coercion. The Parliamentary Ombudsman has in several visit reports and in the Special Report to the Storting on Solitary Confinement and Lack of Human Contact in Norwegian Prisons, pointed out that solitary ­confinement in prison can increase the risk of ­suicide, self-harm and development of serious mental disorders.46 Several of the cases where r­ estraint beds were used seemed to result from precisely such a sequence of events; where ­suicidal inmates had been placed in solitary confinement and started to self-harm in the security cell. People who are suicidal or have inflicted serious self-harm need medical assistance. If restraint beds in practice become a measure that prevents inmates from getting the medical assistance they require, the use of restraint beds can constitute discrimination and a violation of the inmates’ right to receive medical assistance. View into a cell equipped with a restraint bed through a ­surveillance mirror over the door to the cell. The fact that women are at a higher risk of being placed in restraints than men, and that they are more often put in restraints several times, raises additional questions about discrimination. Lack of legal safeguards Although the use of restraint beds is one of the most intrusive measures a prison can use, the ­quality of the decisions and supervision logs show significant shortcomings in the legal safeguards for those ­concerned. A large number of decisions do not explain why the measure was deemed strictly necessary, or document why the decision should be upheld, and there is no documentation stating that less intrusive measures have been attempted. These extensive shortcomings prevent a real p ­ ossibility to file a complaint and raise major issues in relation to internal oversight. Many of the factors indicate a violation of the prohibition against inhuman treatment, set out in the UN Convention against Torture and the ECtHR Article 3 as ­interpreted by the European Court of Human Rights. Based on these factors, the Parliamentary Ombudsman considers there to be a high risk of inhuman treatment in connection with the use of restraint beds and recommends that restraint beds be discontinued in prisons. 46 Special Report to the Storting on Solitary Confinement and Lack of Human Contact in Norwegian Prisons (Document 4:3 (2018/2019), pp. 66–67.