and Santarém. Setúbal two visits, and finally, Oporto and the Autonomous Region of Azores were visited once. Graph II Geographic distribution of all visits made (2014 and 2015) 20 16 15 8 0 0 Sa S a d etúb o C al as te l Vi o la Re al Vi se u a ém es eir or ad A. M rto Aç A. R. re Po 4 3 2 R. oa leg Po rta a iri sb Li rd a Le ro ua a a or br Év G C oi an Br lo te as C 4 0 m co 0 ça a an ag ag o 0 Br Br Be eir Av 0 ja 0 0 5 3 an 3 Vi 3 Fa 5 7 5 ar 6 nt 10 The graph above reproduces the geographic distribution of all visits made since the beginning of NPM’s activity, which dating back to July of 2014. Overall, it can be concluded that, despite some districts have not yet been visited, the main areas of the country – that is, North, Central and South, as well as Autonomous Regions – have been visited. The next graph illustrates the inspection visits regarding the characterization of places of detention. Of the 50 visits, 19 (38%) were held in prisons, one of which was military. The places of detention of police forces were visited 16 times and the educational centres for young people were visited seven times. It is important to mention that, during 2015, NPM has given particular attention to educational centres. For this reason, NPM visited all the educational centres that exist in the national territory and, alongside these, there was a follow-up visit to determine whether one of the recommendations issued was or not accepted by the entity addressed. It should be noted, finally, that three visits were made to the centres of temporary accommodation of foreigners. | 15