CCPR/C/122/D/2292/2013 Covenant. The Committee considers that the information at its disposal demonstrates that the State party took into account all the elements available when evaluating the risk faced by the author — including the reports of the persecution of Christians, converts to Christianity and homosexuals in Egypt — and that the author has not identified any irregularity in the decision-making process. The Committee also considers that, while the author disagrees with the factual conclusions of the State party’s authorities, he has not shown that they were arbitrary or manifestly erroneous, or that they amounted to a denial of justice. Consequently, the Committee considers that the evidence and circumstances mentioned by the author do not demonstrate that he would be at real and personal risk of being subjected to treatment contrary to articles 6 or 7 of the Covenant. In view thereof, the Committee is not able to conclude that the information before it shows that the author’s rights under articles 6 (1) and 7 of the Covenant would be violated if he were removed to Egypt. 11. The Human Rights Committee, acting under article 5 (4) of the Optional Protocol, is of the view that the facts before it do not permit it to conclude that the author’s expulsion to Egypt would, if implemented, violate his rights under articles 6 (1) and 7 of the Covenant. GE.18-09612 15