48 Gender and Security Toolkit Endnotes 1. A. Coyle and A. Fair (2018) A Human Rights Approach to Prison Management. Handbook for Prison Staff, 3rd edn, London: Institute for Criminal Policy Research, p. 125. 2. Ibid. 3. UN General Assembly (2015) “Discrimination and violence against individuals based on their sexual orientation and gender identity”, report of the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, UN Doc. A/HRC/29/23, para. 25. For more information on why some groups may not make formal complaints, see Prison and Probation Ombudsman for England and Wales (2015) “Learning from PPO investigations: Why do women and young people in custody not make formal complaints?”, London: PPO. 4. G. Nuttall and P. Jurisic (2015) “How to build a prison compliant with human rights norms”, blog post, London: Penal Reform International, www.penalreform.org/blog/how-to-build-a-prison-compliant-with-human/ (accessed 17 October 2019). 5. Drawing upon L. Maiello and S. Carter (2015) “‘Minus the urinals and painted pink’? What should a women’s prison look like?”, blog post, London: Penal Reform International, www.penalreform.org/blog/10020/ (accessed 17 October 2019). 6. Jean Corston (2007) “Corston Report. A report by Baroness Jean Corston of a review of women with particular vulnerabilities in the criminal justice system”, London: Home Office. 7. Lord Bradley (2009) “The Bradley Report”, London: Department of Health. For more information on prison infrastructure and mental health see D. M. López and L. Maiello-Reidy (2017) “Prisons and the mentally ill: Why design matters”, blog post, London: Penal Reform International, www.penalreform.org/blog/prisons-and-thementally-ill-why-design-matters/ (accessed 17 October 2019). 8. M. Schönteich and R. O. Varenik (2014) Presumption of Guilt: The Global Overuse of Pretrial Detention, New York: Open Society Foundations, p. 7. 9. Ibid., p. 60. 10. T. Rytter, J. Baker and Dignity (Danish Institute against Torture) (2014) “Conditions for women in detention: Needs, vulnerabilities and good practices”, Copenhagen: Dignity, p. 31. 11. Ibid., p. 15. 12. UN Women, UNFPA, WHO, UNDP and UNODC (2015) “Module 3: Justice and policing”, in Essential Services Package for Women and Girls Subject to Violence: Core Elements and Quality Guidelines, New York: UN Women. 13. UNODC (2014) Handbook on Women and Imprisonment, Vienna: UN Office on Drugs and Crime, p. 20. 14. OSCE/ODIHR and PRI (2018) Guidance Document on the Nelson Mandela Rules: Implementing the United Nations Revised Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners, Warsaw: ODIHR, p. 63. 15. E. M. Wright, P. Van Voorhis, E. J. Salisbury and A. Bauman (2009) “Lessons from the NIC/UC gender-responsive classification project”, Women, Girls & Criminal Justice, 10(6), pp. 85–87. 16. J.-S. Blanc (2015) “LGBTI persons deprived of their liberty: A framework for preventive monitoring”, 2nd edn, London and Geneva: Penal Reform International and Association for the Prevention of Torture, p. 9. 17. Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (2015) “Eighth annual report”, UN Doc. CAT/C/54/2, 26 March, para. 68. 18. S. Fazel, A. J. Hayes, K. Bartellas, M. Clerici and R. Trestman (2016) “The mental health of prisoners: A review of prevalence, adverse outcomes and interventions”, Lancet Psychiatry, 3, pp. 871–881. 19. Pan-American Health Organization, John Snow Inc. and World Professional Association for Transgender Health (2014) “Blueprint for the provision of comprehensive care for trans persons and their communities in the Caribbean and other anglophone countries”, Arlington, VA: John Snow, p. 21. 20. Ibid., p. 24. 21. G. Fedock and S. S. Covington (2017) “Correctional programming and gender���, in Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Criminology, New York: Oxford University Press. 22. C. Trotter and C. Flynn (2016) “Literature review: Best practice with women offenders”, Melbourne, Vic.: Monash University Criminal Justice Research Consortium, p. 4. 23. A. Huber (2016) “Women in criminal justice systems and the added value of the UN Bangkok Rules”, in H. Kury, S. Redo and E. Shea (eds) Women and Children as Victims and Offenders: Background, Prevention, Reintegration. Suggestions for Succeeding Generations, Vol. 2, Basel: Springer, pp. 35–84. 24. University of Chicago Law School International Human Rights Clinic, Defensoría General de la Nación (Argentina) and Cornell Law School (2013) “Women in prison in Argentina: Causes, conditions, and consequences”, Ithaca, NY: Avon Global Center for Women and Justice and Dorothea S. Clarke Program in Feminist Jurisprudence, https:// scholarship.law.cornell.edu/avon_clarke/4/ (accessed 26 October 2019), p. 2. 25. Hasham Cheema (2017) “The uncertain future of Karachi’s imprisoned children”, Dawn News, 14 March, www. dawn.com/news/1319619?fbclid=IwAR358uUKv-wcPHTlK8upEqZ3AKTQZCVqfadPeucTQA90a8SZiX9BcGwgH3M (accessed 17 October 2019). 26. Rytter et al., note 10 above, p. 68. 27. I. Mulheirn, B. Gough and V. Menne (2010) “Prison break: Tackling recidivism, reducing costs”, London: Social Market Foundation, http://www.smf.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Publication-Prison-Break-Tacklingrecidivism-reducing-costs.pdf (accessed 26 October 2019).