Annual Report 2014 of the National Preventive Mechanism Occupational workshop at the HPP of Fontcalent, at Alicante 233. In this respect, it would be advisable for the responsible authorities to implement protocols for assessment of the risk of repetition, using objective valuation scales permitting an evaluation of the minor, moderate or serious risk posed by a patient, which could facilitate the making of administrative and court decisions. 234. Given the particular features of the internment in these centres, the multidisciplinary team must issue a report every six months on the state and evolution of the patient for due control by the court. Based on such information, the penitentiary surveillance judge may make to the sentencing court or judge, at least once every year, a proposal to maintain, terminate, replace or change the security measure of deprivation of liberty. In the opinion of this institution, the information sent regularly to the penitentiary surveillance judge should be as exhaustive as possible. 235. It is essential to prepare the exist and accompanying of the patient in the first steps of the social reinsertion process, providing adequate prior and subsequent support to the family environment and arranging the transfer of the patient to the clinical resources and social services of the area. The geographical proximity of the place where the measure is served and the customary place of residence permits adapted programs to be implemented, to work on community insertion and not to lose the relationship of the patient with his surrounding. 236. The provisions of the disciplinary regime of the Penitentiary Regulation do not apply to patients of penitentiary psychiatric units and hospitals. In the case of violation of the cohabitation rules, measures are applied depending on the context and patient, with the need to give the appropriate instructions for them to follow adequate procedures for adoption of therapeutic measures, such as medical prescription and inclusion in a therapeutic context. 88