CAT/C/63/D/732/2016 Federation. The Committee notes, however, that the complainants have not provided any further substantiation as to this claim and therefore finds that they have failed to substantiate that A.Z. would be at risk of facing treatment contrary to article 3 of the Convention in connection to the alleged incident of August 2013. 7.6 On the basis of the above, and in the light of the material before it, the Committee considers that the complainants have failed to sufficiently substantiate for the purpose of admissibility that their forcible removal to the Russian Federation would expose them to a foreseeable, real and personal risk of torture within the meaning of article 3 of the Convention. 8. The Committee therefore decides: (a) That the communication is inadmissible under article 22 (2) of the Convention; (b) That the present decision shall be communicated to the complainants and to the State party. 6