E/CN.4/2003/68/Add.2
page 36
started to yell at them that he needed the facts, and that this was not a confession but just a bunch
of chatter. He allegedly stated that he could “investigate” the case like that himself, with his
fists, if he wanted to, and that he did not believe for a minute that Dmitry Chikunov was guilty.
After that, he reportedly left. They allegedly brought Dmitry Chikunov back into the office, beat
him again, and yelled that he had “screwed everything up”, and that they would kill him. After
conferring amongst themselves, they reportedly told him that they had no other choice than to
kill him in a supposed escape attempt. They reportedly led him out into the street to a car. Four
investigators took him to the scene of the crime, threatened and abusing him in the car and
telling him that they would only need to make one phone call in order to realize all their threats
against Dmitry Chikunov’s mother. When they arrived at the place, they reportedly led
Dmitry Chikunov in front of the headlights and turned his back to them. One of them is said to
have walked up to him, cocking the trigger on a pistol, and then putting the barrel of the gun to
the back of his head. One of the investigators reportedly made a telephone call and commanded
that Tamara Chikunova be found. Dmitry Chikunov is said to have begged them not to touch his
mother. They then reportedly told him that he had to act completely in accordance with their
commands, and say only what he was told to say, to which he agreed. Then investigators
reportedly congratulated each other, and kissed each other after the Uzbek custom. They
reportedly drove back to the GUVD. Three days after his arrest, his mother was reportedly
called to bring new clothes to her son. She stated that she would only do so in exchange for his
other clothes. The investigators are said to have given her her son’s clothes, after an effort had
been made to clean them. Traces of blood were clearly discernible on the clothes, on his
underpants, in the waist area of his trousers and on the shirt. The investigators allegedly asked
her to return her son’s clothes which she refused. Dmitry Chikunov was reportedly held at the
GUVD for about 20 days, and interrogated every day. They reportedly deprived him of sleep,
constantly beat him with truncheons, kicked him, spit on him and told him that he was their
slave. They reportedly told him that they would make him pay for not having shot him. During
the night, they reportedly took him out of the cell several times to beat him. The two main
investigators, including the arresting investigator, are believed to have been in charge of the
others. They reportedly did not return him to the prison until 4 May, and again returned him to
the GUVD on 6 May, where he was reportedly beaten again, and humiliated. He was reportedly
told that the investigators had “helped” his mother to hang herself. When Dmitry Chikunov
threw himself at them, they are said to have tortured him again for two days, using the gas mask
and the “swallow” method. They reportedly held him there for more than 10 days, and sent him
back to prison at the end of the twelfth day. In May 1999, an arrest warrant was issued for
Tamara Chikunova. She was reportedly allowed to see her son only if she provided the
investigators with information. She reportedly hired a lawyer who was not allowed to see
Dmitry Chikunov for five months whilst the investigation was ongoing. During the
investigation, he was reportedly held in the basement of the district IVS/SIZO in Tashkent. She
was reportedly told that her son would be killed in the basement if he did not confess. After the
investigation, her son is said to have written a statement stating that he was guilty on the
condition that he would be transferred to prison and that his mother’s life would be spared.
Tamara Chikunova was said to have only been allowed to see her son after five months who had
reportedly lost half his weight. The witnesses at the trial were the police officers who had
reportedly beaten him. When Dmitry Chikunov told the court that he was not guilty and that he
had confessed under torture, the judge is said to have stated, “No, you are the killer and now you
see the independence of the judiciary.” Dmitry Chikunov’s lawyer was not allowed to
participate in the trial. Instead, his State-appointed lawyer gave testimony in court against him,
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents