68 GÄFGEN v. GERMANY JUDGMENT – SEPARATE OPINIONS – had already expressly and unequivocally acknowledged in their three decisions of 2003 and 2004: the applicant, having been threatened with torture in order to make him disclose the child’s whereabouts, was subjected to “inhuman treatment as prohibited by Article 3” (see paragraph 131 of the judgment). On this precise issue all of us – the national judicial authorities, the Government, the applicant and the judges of the Court – are in agreement. 10. Ultimately, this judgment will not even result in an award to the applicant by way of just satisfaction.