9.11.2017
A & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] EWCA Civ 1123 (11 August 2004)
'admissibility' of the confession into an inquisition of an accused. That would be
repugnant to our accepted standards and principles of justice; it would invite and
encourage brutality in the handling of persons suspected of having committed offences"
92. I can read those statements only as an affirmation of the concern of the common law to protect accused
persons from oppression. The rule was based not merely on concerns about the reliability of evidence
obtained by oppression; it protected accused persons from oppression and marked the repugnance of
the common law, in the context of criminal trials, to evidence so obtained from a defendant. Section 76
of the 1984 Act, influenced I would expect by the jurisprudence under Article 6 of the Convention,
embodied the same principle.
Abuse of process
93. Mr Emmerson also relies on the abuse of process jurisdiction exercised in criminal courts in England
and Wales, which has, he submits, the same rationale as the exclusion of tainted confessions. In R v
Horseferry Road Magistrates Court ex parte Bennett [1994] 1 AC 42, Lord Lowry stated, at page 76C:
"… the court, in order to protect its own process from being degraded and misused, must
have the power to stay proceedings which have come before it and have only been made
possible by acts which offend the court's conscience as being contrary to the rule of law.
Those acts by providing a morally unacceptable foundation for the exercise of jurisdiction
over the suspect taint the proposed trial and, if tolerated, will mean that the court's process
has been abused."
94. In R v Latif [1996] 1 WLR 104, Lord Steyn said, at page 112H:
"The law is settled. Weighing countervailing considerations of policy and justice, it is for
the judge in the exercise of his discretion to decide whether there has been an abuse of
process, which amounts to an affront to the public conscience and requires the criminal
proceedings to be stayed: R v Horseferry Road Magistrates' Court, ex p. Bennett… The
speeches in Bennett conclusively establish that proceedings may be stayed in the exercise
of the judge's discretion not only where a fair trial is impossible but also where it would be
contrary to the public interest in the integrity of the criminal justice system that trial
should take place. An infinite variety of cases could arise."
95. In R v Looseley, Attorney-General's Reference (No.3 of 2000) [2001] 1 WLR 2060, the House of Lords
considered the admissibility of evidence obtained as a result of undercover police officers dealing with
drug dealers. Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead stated, at paragraph 1:
"My Lords, every court has an inherent power and duty to prevent abuse of its process.
This is a fundamental principle of the rule of law. By recourse to this principle courts
ensure that executive agents of the state do not misuse the coercive, law enforcement
functions of the courts and thereby oppress citizens of the state. Entrapment, with which
these two appeals are concerned, is an instance where such misuse may occur. It is simply
not acceptable that the state through its agents should lure its citizens into committing acts
forbidden by the law and then seek to prosecute them for doing so. That would be
entrapment. That would be a misuse of state power, and an abuse of the process of the
courts. The unattractive consequences, frightening and sinister in extreme cases, which
state conduct of this nature could have are obvious. The role of the courts is to stand
between the state and its citizens and make sure this does not happen."
96. Lord Nicholls referred to R v Sang [1980] AC 402, ex parte Bennett and Latif. He stated, at paragraph
15:
"These statutory and common law developments have been reinforced by the Human
Rights Act 1998. It is unlawful for the court, as a public authority, to act in a way which is
incompatible with a Convention right. Entrapment, and the use of evidence obtained by
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2004/1123.html
21/113
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents