Recommendations
(E/CN.4/2006/6/Add.3)
ill-treatment by public
officials will not be
tolerated and will be
subject to prosecution
(a)
Judges and prosecutors
routinely ask persons
brought from police
custody how they have
been treated, and even
in the absence of a
formal complaint from
the defendant, order an
independent medical
examination (b)
Situation during visit
(See: E/CN.4/2006/6/Add.3)
Steps taken in previous years
(See: A/HRC/4/33/Add.2 and
A/HRC/7/3/Add.2)
Information received on steps taken since
December 2007/current situation
Not in place
•
Government 2008: The suggestions that
judges should ask every person whether
he/she has been ill-treated will be taken into
account in the course of further criminal
justice reform.
•
•
•
A/HRC/10/44/Add.5
page 23
•
A Manual containing clearer
guidelines on the modalities of the
use of force and subjecting the use
of force to a stricter review has
been elaborated
CPC para. 73(f) states that a
medical examination is an absolute
right that can neither be denied nor
restricted. Article 73(f) refers to
medical expertise (needed for the
determination of important factual
circumstances of a case), which is
subject to a court decision
Article 922 of the Law on
Imprisonment of 23 June 2005
requires a medical examination
after every transfer
CPC article 263, provides that, if
information recorded upon the
routine medical examination shows
that a prisoner has injuries, the
prosecutor can initiate a
preliminary investigation, even in
the absence of allegations from the
detainee
Internal Guidelines of the
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents