PART 2.1
law.161 The Trafficking Protocol specifically refers
to this obligation (art. 14), as does the European
Trafficking Convention (art. 40). In the context of
international refugee law, the obligation prevents
States from returning a person to another State
where there are substantial grounds for
believing that the individual in question would
be subjected to persecution. In relation to a
case involving a victim or potential victim of
trafficking, a determination on this point would
need to take into account the factors raised
above relating to the willingness and capacity of
the State to prevent and protect from trafficking.
(Footnote 160 continued)
they would be at risk of being trafficked upon return to
their country of origin: V01/13868 [2002] RRTA 799
(6 September 2002); N02/43616 [2003] RRTA 290
(31 March 2003); V03/16442 [2004] RRTA 474 (25
June 2004). In 2001, US authorities found a claimant
had established a well-founded fear of persecution
related to both forced prostitution and sexual slavery. It
was not clear whether the grounds were political opinion
or membership of a particular social group: Matter of
J-M (number withheld) (BIA 30 March, 2001). Other
recent US cases appear to indicate a tendency to identify
failure to protect against forced prostitution as leading
to persecution (based on the individual belonging to a
social group defined as those who are under threat of
being forced into prostitution). For cases considered by
the United Kingdom Immigration Appeal Tribunal involving
trafficked women and girls from Ukraine and Nigeria,
see Annette Lansink, Women and Migration, Interim Report
on Trafficking in Women, Committee on Feminism and
International Law, Report of the 71st Conference of the
International Law Association in Berlin (2004), pp. 20-21.
For a comprehensive analysis of trafficking-related asylum
applications and relevant case law in four major destination
countries (Australia, Canada, United Kingdom, United
States), see Kaori Saito, International protection for trafficked
persons and those who fear being trafficked, UNHCR
Research Paper No. 149 (2007), available at http://www
.unhcr.org/research/RESEARCH/476652742.pdf.
See Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for
Refugees, The Principle of Non-Refoulement as a Norm of
Customary International Law: Response to the Questions
Posed to UNHCR by the Federal Constitutional Court of the
Federal Republic of Germany in Cases 2 BvR 1938/93,
2 BvR 1953/93, 2 BvR 1954/93 (31 January 1994);
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for
Refugees, “Summary Conclusions: The Principle of NonRefoulement: Expert Roundtable organized by the UNHCR
and the Lauterpacht Research Centre for International
Law, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom, 9–10 July
2001” in Erika Feller, Volker Türk and Frances Nicholson
(eds.), Refugee Protection in International Law: UNHCR’s
Global Consultations on International Protection (2003),
p. 178; Nils Coleman, “Renewed review of the status of
the principle of non-refoulement as customary international
law”, European Journal of Migration and Law, vol. 5, No.
1 (2003), p. 23.
The rule of non-refoulement extends beyond
international refugee law. States are prevented
from returning or extraditing a person to another
State where there are substantial grounds for
believing that the individual in question would be
subject to torture or other forms of ill-treatment.162
For a detailed consideration of the principle
of non-refoulement in the specific context of
the repatriation of victims of trafficking, see
the discussion under Principle 11 and related
guidelines.
ENSURING NON-VIOLATION OF ESTABLISHED
RIGHTS
Guideline 2.7 sets out what is required in order
to ensure there are not violations of established
rights in the context of international refugee law
including the principle of non-refoulement:
[States should consider ensuring] that
procedures and processes are in place for
receipt and consideration of asylum claims from
both trafficked persons and smuggled asylum
seekers and that the principle of non-refoulement
is respected and upheld at all times.
161
92
The UNHCR Trafficking Guidelines provide
further information on a number of important
practical requirements:
Convention against Torture, article 3 (1); Refugee
Convention, article 33; International Covenant on Civil
and Political Rights, article 7; Convention on the Rights
of the Child, article 22. Note that the United Nations
Special Rapporteur on Torture has recently linked torture
and related harms to gender-based violence including
trafficking (A/HRC/7/3, paras. 44, 56-58).
162
RECOMMENDED PRINCIPLES AND GUIDELINES ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND HUMAN TRAFFICKING
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents