Child and youth welfare facilities
Expansion of nonresidential care is
making an impact
There were also major differences in the number of cases in non-residential
care. What is particularly noticeable is that Vienna, which is in first place when
it comes to full residential care, is in second last place with 19.1% for nonresidential care or parental support. Monocausal interpretation of this data
does not do justice to the complexity of the operating environment in which
child and youth welfare is locally active, and should therefore be avoided.
It can, however, be seen from the statistics, that the range of available nonresidential care forms evidently has an effect on the amount of residential
care.
Children and adolescents under parental support programmes
per 1,000 inhabitants under 18 years in 2017 and 2018
Source: Statistik Austria, child and youth welfare statistics
The picture is similar if the ratio between these two types of support is compared
with each other. In Vienna, the share of full residential care is 39.29% and
the share of non-residential care/parental support programmes is 60.71%.
By comparison, in Burgenland 19.15% of support forms are residential care,
80.85% are non-residential.
Child and youth welfare statistics alone do not answer the question as to how
high the compensatory effects between non-residential child and your welfare
69
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents