Case
No. 91/1997
A. v. The
Netherlands
(cont’d)
No. 97/1997
Orhan Ayas v.
Sweden
Date of
adoption
Nationality of
complainant
and country of
removal if
applicable
Article of
Covenant
violated
Interim
measures
granted and
State party’s
response
12 Nov.
1998
Turkish to
Turkey
3
Granted and
acceded to by
the State party
No.101/1997
Halil Haydin
v. Sweden
20 Nov.
1998
Turkish to
Turkey
3
Granted and
acceded to by
the State party
No. 110/1998
Chipana v.
Venezuela
10 Nov.
1998
Peruvian to
Peru
Complainant’s
extradition to
Peru
constituted a
violation of
article 3
Granted but
not acceded to
by the
State party4
Remedy
any other country where he
runs a real risk of being
expelled or returned to
Tunisia.
The State party has an
obligation to refrain from
forcibly returning the
complainant to Turkey or to
any other country where he
runs a real risk of being
expelled or returned to
Turkey.
The State party has an
obligation to refrain from
forcibly returning the
complainant to Turkey, or to
any other country where he
runs a real risk of being
expelled or returned to
Turkey.
None
Follow-up
Further action
No information provided
Request
information
No information provided
Request
information
On 13 June 2001, the
State party reported on the
conditions of detention of the
complainant in the prison of
Chorillos, Lima. On
23 November 2000, the
Ambassador of Venezuela to
Peru, together with
representatives of the Peruvian
administration, visited the
complainant in prison. The
Request update
63
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents