70 Case Date of adoption No. 133/1999 Falcon Rio v. Canada 30 Nov. 2004 Nationality of complainant and country of removal if applicable Mexican to Mexico Article of Covenant violated 3 Interim measures granted and State party’s response Requested and acceded to by the State party Remedy Relevant measures Follow-up On 9 March 2005, the State party provided information on follow-up. It stated that the complainant had submitted a request for a risk assessment prior to return to Mexico and that the State party would inform the Committee of the outcome. If the complainant could establish one of the motives for protection under the Immigration and Protection of Refugee’s Law he would be able to present a request for permanent residence in Canada. The Committee’s decision would be taken into account by the examining officer and the complainant would be heard orally if the Minister considered it necessary. Since the request for asylum had been considered prior to the entry into force of the Immigration and Protection of Refugee’s Law, that is prior to June 2002, the immigration agent would not be restricted to assessing facts after the Further action Update to be requested