Case No. 161/2000 Hajrizi Dzemajl et al. v. Yugoslavia (cont’d) No. 171/2000 Dimitrov v. Serbia and Montenegro No.185/2001 Chedli Ben Ahmed Karoui v. Sweden Date of adoption Nationality of complainant and country of removal if applicable 3 May 2005 Not applicable 8 May 2002 Tunisian to Tunisia Article of Covenant violated Interim measures granted and State party’s response 2, para. 1, in connection with 1, 12, 13 and 14 Not applicable 3 Granted and acceded to by the State party Remedy Follow-up it, within 90 days from the date of the transmittal of this decision, of the steps taken in response to its observations. The Committee urges the State party to conduct a proper investigation into the facts alleged by the complainant and, in accordance with rule 112, paragraph 5, of its rules of procedure, to inform it, within 90 days from the date of the transmittal of this decision, of the steps taken in response to its observations. None State party should be reminded of its obligation to conduct a proper investigation into the facts of the case. Further action 90 days has not expired No action required No further consideration under follow-up procedure. See first follow-up report (CAT/C/32/FU/1) in which it was stated that, on 4 June 2002, the Board revoked the expulsion decisions regarding the complainant and his family. They were also granted permanent residence permits on the basis of this decision. No further consideration under the follow-up procedure as the State party has complied with the Committee’s decision. 73