Criminal detention and alternatives: fundamental rights aspects in EU cross-border transfers
In some states, there are no clear rules – hence, whether
it is possible to revoke consent will depend on the jurisprudence and practice. The interpretation can go either
way: if the law does not provide for such a possibility,
it is not allowed; or, since the law does not explicitly
prohibit it, it is allowed.
When it comes to revoking consent to transfers of probation measures, the law or practice of only five states
(Denmark, Finland, Hungary, Malta and the Netherlands)
provide for such a possibility. Only four states – Denmark, Finland, Hungary and Latvia – allow for revoking
consent to transfers of supervision measures.
Ten EU Member States (Belgium, Denmark, Finland,
Hungary, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal,
Sweden, and the United Kingdom) provide for a possibility to revoke consent for transfers of prisoners
either in law or in practice. Eleven (Belgium, the Czech
Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary,
Italy, Latvia, Portugal and the United Kingdom) allow
for changing one’s opinion. In Italy, very few cases of
actual withdrawals of consent have been reported, as
confirmed by a representative of the Italian Ministry
of Justice.315 Likewise, in practice in Portugal, consent
is withdrawn in very few situations, and when it is,
it is normally linked to the sentenced person having
obtained his/her conditional release.316
6.8. Right to appeal
forwarding decisions in
the issuing state
Decisions on forwarding judgments/decisions together
with the certificates are made in accordance with
domestic law. The three transfer decisions provide that
each EU Member State shall determine which authorities are competent in accordance with a given Framework Decision, when that Member State is the issuing
state or the executing state.317 However, none contains
a provision about a right to appeal decisions made by
Figure 16: Possibility to appeal transfer decisions in EU Member States
20
18
AT
BE
BG
CY
CZ
DK
EL
FR
HR
HU
LU
MT
NL
PL
16
14
12
10
DE
EE
ES
FI
FR
LT
LV
NL
RO
SE
UK
8
6
4
2
0
AT
BE
CY
CZ
DK
EL
HR
HU
IT
LU
MT
PL
PT
EE
ES
FI
LT
LV
BG
IE
Framework Decision on
transfer of prisoners
Possibility to appeal
Source:
Framework Decision on
probation and alternative
sanctions
No possibility to appeal
EE
ES
FI
LT
PT
BE
BG
CY
DE
IE
LU
SE
UK
Framework Decision on the ESO
Not implemented/implementation pending
FRA, 2015
315 Italy, Representative of the Directorate General for Criminal
Justice.
316 Portugal, Representative of the Prosecutor General’s Office.
96
DE
IE
IT
SE
UK
AT
CZ
DK
EL
FR
HR
HU
IT
LV
MT
NL
PL
RO
317 See Council Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA, Art. 2 (1);
Council Framework Decision 2008/947/JHA, Art. 3 (1);
Council Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA, Art. 6 (1).
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents