EXAMPLES OF NPM SUBMISSIONS TO THE UNITED NATIONS TREATY BODIES
Submission by the Norwegian NPM of supplementary information to the Committee on the
Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) Pre-Sessional Working Group
in March, in relation to Norway’s 9th Periodic Report and the examination of Norway by CEDAW
in October 2017:
http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/Treaties/CEDAW/Shared%20Documents/NOR/INT_CEDAW_IFN_
NOR_26505_E.pdf.
Submission by the NPM of Switzerland (Commission nationale de prévention de la torture) to the
Committee against Torture (CAT) in relation to Switzerland’s 7th periodic report in March 2015:
http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=INT%2fCAT
%2fNHS%2fCHE%2f21161&Lang=en.
Submission by the NPM of Paraguay (Mecanismo nacional de prevención de la tortura) to the
Committee against Torture (CAT) in relation to Paraguay’s 7th periodic report in August 2017:
http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/SessionDetails1.
aspx?SessionID=1132&Lang=en.
NPMs should promote and follow up on recommendations from the United Nations and regional
bodies, relevant to their mandate, at the national level.
Public awareness
As observed, NPMs should develop strategies for making their mandates and work known to the public
in order to ensure public understanding of their roles and responsibilities, and emphasize their preventive
focus (see example of interactive programmes on community radios, in the text box on page 30).
NPMs should also establish simple, accessible and confidential procedures through which the public
might provide them with relevant information.
The strategies of NPMs have included the conduct of public campaigns, production of promotional
materials and the development of web pages.
© UN/OHCHR Photo
KEY CRITERIA FOR AN EFFECTIVE NATIONAL PREVENTIVE MECHANISM I
33
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents