CCPR/C/117/D/2745/2016 concerning their fears and risks upon return to the Islamic Republic of Iran suffered from any such defects.6 4.6 In these circumstances, and in the absence of any other pertinent information on file, while not underestimating the concerns that may legitimately be expressed with respect to the general human rights situation in the Islamic Republic of Iran, the Committee concludes that in the present case the authors have failed to sufficiently substantiate their claims for the purposes of admissibility and, accordingly, declares the communication inadmissible under article 2 of the Optional Protocol. 5. 6 4 The Committee therefore decides: (a) Protocol; That the communication is inadmissible under article 2 of the Optional (b) authors. That the present decision shall be communicated to the State party and to the See, for example, communication No. 2198/2012, V.D. v. the Russian Federation, decision adopted on 30 March 2016, para. 5.5.