Remedy recommended To remedy the violation of article 3 and to consult with the Tunisian authorities on the whereabouts and state of well-being of the complainant. Due date for State party response 13 August 2007 Date of reply 15 August 2007 State party response Following several requests for information made by the State party, the Tunisian authorities indicated that the complainant had not been disturbed since his arrival in Tunisia on 7 August 2006 and that no legal action had been initiated against him. He lives with his family in Testour, Beja Governorate. The State party monitors the situation of the complainant and is trying to verify the information provided by the Tunisian authorities. Complainant’s response Not yet received Committee’s decision The Committee considers the dialogue ongoing. State party THE NETHERLANDS Case Ali Jeljeli, 91/1997 Nationality and country of removal if applicable Tunisian to Tunisia Views adopted on 13 November 1998 Issues and violations found Removal - article 3 Interim measures granted and State party response Requested and acceded to by the State party. Remedy recommended The State party has an obligation to refrain from forcibly returning the complainant to Tunisia or to any other country where he runs a real risk of being expelled or returned to Tunisia. Committee with a fait accompli, the State party not only failed to demonstrate the good faith required of any party to a treaty, but also failed to meet its obligations under articles 3 and 22 of the Convention. 124