State party
SENEGAL
Case
Suleymane Guengueng and others,
181/2001
Nationality and country of removal
if applicable
N/A
Views adopted on
17 May 2006
Issues and violations found
Failure to prosecute - articles 5, paragraph 2,
and 7
Interim measures granted and State party
response
N/A
Remedy recommended
In pursuance of rule 112, paragraph 5, of its
rules of procedure, the Committee requests
the State party to inform it, within 90 days of
the date of the transmittal of this decision, of
the steps it has taken in response to the views
expressed above.
Due date for State party response
16 August 2006
Date of reply
17 June 2008 (had previously responded
on 18 August, 28 September 2006,
8 March 2007 and 31 July 2007)
State party response
On 18 August 2006, the State party denied
that it had violated the Convention, and
reiterated its arguments on the merits,
including its argument on article 5 that under
the Convention a State party is not obliged to
meet its obligations within a particular time.
The extradition request was dealt with under
national law applicable between the State
party and States with which it does not have
an extradition treaty. It stated that any other
way of handling this case would have violated
national law. The integration of article 5 into
domestic law is in its final stage and the
relevant text would be examined by the
Legislative Authority. To avoid possible
impunity, the State party submitted that it had
deferred the case to the African Union for
consideration, thus avoiding a violation of
126
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents