CAT/C/71/D/904/2018 insufficient to establish that, almost six years after the alleged events occurred, she would be at a foreseeable, personal and real risk of torture if she were returned to Ethiopia. 11 8. In the light of the foregoing, the Committee, acting under article 22 (7) of the Convention, concludes that the return of the complainant to Ethiopia by the State party would not constitute a violation of article 3 of the Convention. 11 See, e.g., V.M. v. Australia (CAT/C/67/D/723/2015), para. 7.8; Ranawaka v. Australia (CAT/C/68/D/855/2017), paras. 9.7–9.8; S.P. v. Australia (CAT/C/68/D/718/2015), para. 7.7; and I.P.W.F. v. Australia (CAT/C/63/D/618/2014), para. 8.7. 9