JALLOH v. GERMANY JUDGMENT 35 rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points; 5. Dismisses unanimously the remainder of the applicant’s claim for just satisfaction. Done in English and in French, and delivered at a public hearing in the Human Rights Building, Strasbourg, on 11 July 2006. Lawrence Early Deputy Registrar Luzius Wildhaber President In accordance with Article 45 § 2 of the Convention and Rule 74 § 2 of the Rules of Court, the following separate opinions are annexed to this judgment: (a) concurring opinion of Judge Bratza; (b) concurring opinion of Judge Zupančič; (c) dissenting opinion of Judges Wildhaber and Caflisch; (d) joint dissenting opinion of Judges Ress, Pellonpää, Baka and Šikuta; (e) dissenting opinion of Judge Hajiyev. L.W. T.L.E.

Select target paragraph3

Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents