JALLOH v. GERMANY JUDGMENT
35
rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank
during the default period plus three percentage points;
5. Dismisses unanimously the remainder of the applicant’s claim for just
satisfaction.
Done in English and in French, and delivered at a public hearing in the
Human Rights Building, Strasbourg, on 11 July 2006.
Lawrence Early
Deputy Registrar
Luzius Wildhaber
President
In accordance with Article 45 § 2 of the Convention and Rule 74 § 2 of
the Rules of Court, the following separate opinions are annexed to this
judgment:
(a) concurring opinion of Judge Bratza;
(b) concurring opinion of Judge Zupančič;
(c) dissenting opinion of Judges Wildhaber and Caflisch;
(d) joint dissenting opinion of Judges Ress, Pellonpää, Baka and Šikuta;
(e) dissenting opinion of Judge Hajiyev.
L.W.
T.L.E.
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents