C. No. 318/1988 [39] E. P. et al. v. Colombia ...................................................... 53 No. 329/1988 [38] D. F. v. Jamaica ................................................................. 56 No. 342/1988 [35] R. L. v. Canada .................................................................. 57 No. 360/1989* [36] Newspaper company v. Trinidad and Tobago ..................... 57 Views of the Human Rights Committee under article 5 (4) of the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights***................ 59 No. 162/1983 [34] Omar Berterretche Acosta v. Uruguay ................................ 59 No. 167/1984 [38] c Lubicon Lake Band v. Canada............................................ 62 No. 181/1984 Arévalo [37] c Alfredo Ráfael and Samuel Humberto Sanjuan v. Colombia ....................................................................... 79 __________ * Sample of a typical communication; the other case numbers, involving the same State party, are reflected in the body of the text. ** The number of the Committee's session is indicated in brackets. *** The Committee's views in every case incorporate the relevant paragraphs of the Committee's earlier decision on admissibility. Page No. 193/1985 [39] c Pierre Giry v. Dominican Republic ..................................... 83 No. 195/1985 [39] William Eduardo Delgado Páez v. Colombia ...................... 85 No. 196/1985 [35] Ibrahima Gueye et al. v. France .......................................... 4 89

Select target paragraph3