Through the Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy Plan of Action, Member
States recognize the need to tackle the conditions conducive to the
spread of terrorism, including by addressing issues such as socio-economic
marginalization, failure to respect human rights and a lack of good
governance. These linkages are complex and require careful consideration
and analysis. It is clear, for example, that economic and social development,
including through international cooperation and assistance, can play a role
in reducing support for terrorism by preventing the conditions that give rise
to violence in general and to terrorism in particular, and by contributing
to long-term social and economic stability. This may include measures to
support structural stability, deny groups or individuals the means to carry
out acts of terrorism, and sustain international cooperation. Conversely,
the diversion of resources normally allocated to social and economic
programmes and sectors (such as education, health, water and sanitation),
development assistance and poverty reduction, in favour of security and
counter-terrorism programming may have serious consequences for
the affected countries and communities. As stated by the Development
Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Development
and Co-operation (OECD), aid allocations should be calibrated carefully
where the prevention of terrorism is a relevant development objective.
In particular, “budget reallocations [should be] preceded by in-depth
analysis of need and aid effectiveness so that development aid contributes
to long-term structural stability and does not become an instrument of
non-development interests.” 105
The adoption of specific counter-terrorism measures may also have a
direct impact on the enjoyment of economic, social and cultural rights. For
example, targeted sanctions against individuals suspected of involvement
in terrorist activity, such as freezing their financial assets or imposing travel
restrictions on them, may be an effective means for tracking, and even
preventing, terrorist activity. However, the current targeted sanctions
regime poses a number of serious challenges, in particular related to the
lack of transparency and due process in listing and de-listing procedures.
Targeted sanctions which result in freezing assets, imposing travel bans
and other restrictions may also have serious consequences for the ability
of the affected individuals and their families to enjoy economic and social
rights, as their access to education and employment may be severely
restricted. The effective use of humanitarian exemptions may be one
important means for limiting the negative impact of targeted sanctions on
the enjoyment of economic, social and cultural rights. Similarly, repressive
security measures (such as control orders and the construction of physical
barriers to limit the movement of certain individuals and groups), adopted
with a view to countering terrorism, have severely restricted the ability of
47
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents