In 2014, the National Ombudsman indicated it did not agree with the way the NPM-network operated and has therefore decided to no longer participate. The National Ombudsman particularly asked for attention to those bottlenecks that may impede the proper functioning of the network, specifically, the structure in relation to collaboration, the role of the various Inspectorates, and the lack of an overall vision. In his response to the Ombudsman the State Secretary for Security and Justice stated that the Netherlands possesses a comprehensive and effective system of supervising the conditions of persons deprived of their liberty. This supervision is the responsibility of the three Inspectorates, which are independent bodies as concerns their operation and judgment processes. Furthermore each institution or location where persons are deprived of their liberty features its own commission of oversight. In addition, the Council for the Administration of Criminal Justice and Protection of Juveniles (RSJ) may, when asked or at its own initiative, advise on new policies and future legislation. According to the State Secretary, the existing network meets the obligations arising from OPCAT5. 5 House of Representatives, 2014-2015, no. 466. 5

Select target paragraph3